“The findings reported here suggest that a level of direct teacher
involvement can result in focused opportunities for students to engage
curricular content.” (Lee & Probert)
I agree with this statement.
Students cannot learn everything through game-play. Teachers need to facilitate
student-learning rather than become instructors of it. However, game-play
should be an instrumental, application tool to assess learning. The teachers
are the ones who can focus and direct content and instruction for students’
optimal learning environments. This comes back to the point of how “the man in
the box”. Without a teacher or a more experienced person, there is no way a
student could get the necessary instruction to achieve the knowledge needed in
their grade level to succeed at the next level in their life. People are necessary
tools for learning, not technology. Technology is a supplemental resource that
enhances the process.
Lee, J. K., & Probert, J. (n.d.). Civilization
III and Whole-Class Play in High School Social Studies1. The Journal of
Social Studies Research, 34(1), 1-28. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:WdD2wWfkvSMJ:https://www.fi.ncsu.edu/assets/research_papers/new-literacies-collaborative/civilization-iii-and-whole-class-play-in-high-school-social-studies.pdf+&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgrS-FzsaMI0_yxz39vf
Other Resource:
References:
Google Image search for "people vs technology".
Mathletics39. (2009, July 21). Scott Flansburg The
Human Calculator on Discovery Channel's More Than Human . Retrieved from
Youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LyoeWLmclU

Good connection to Vygotsky who theorized a more access to an more experienced other is essential for good learning!
ReplyDelete